talkmagic.co.uk

greedoniz wrote:On a completely different note I was wondering how that sense of humour bypass operation went? come on Adrian give us a smile

Just because a sentence contains the word "breasts" doesn't automatically make it funny, you know! No, not even if it contains the word "buttocks" as well.

Adrian Morgan wrote:No, not even if it contains the word "buttocks" as well.

I stooped to pick a buttercup. Why people leave buttocks lying around is completely beyond me.

Tomo wrote:You have to remember that in our society, women are placed under enormous pressure from a very early age to conform to a set of ridiculous visual ideals, whether they are physically capable of fitting those ideals or not.

Thank Goodness there are at least a few men in the universe who understand that. Im rather 'top heavy' in the chest department and Iv been out with a few men who think that if they get me to exist on salad leaves for a few years, Ill end up with that ''perfect'' hourglass body. Next thing theyre complaining that my chest has shrunk! Less than 0.1% of women have the genetic makeup to be the shape that is required of modern supermodels.

supermodels are freaks of nature when you think about it, not the normal everyday woman...

ive discussed the following witha couple of close women mates,and they've agreed with me...

alot of women's magazines, are, predominantly, written and edited by women, and to a much smaller extent, gay fellas...with a small percentage of hetereo fellas too...

that goes for fashion too...i find it both strange, and frightening that women are in fact, planting these horrible twiglet/lollipop headed looks on other women...

i only know one mate of mine who genuinely fancies twig-thin women...the rest of us all much prefer curvy and healthy looking women instead...i dont just mean buxom, like kelly brook for example, but just...well...whatever size suits them, i think that's the best way of putting it...

there's a difference between slender, and stick thin too...

i think if i ever slept with someone like posh spice, afterwards she'd just be a head and a small rattling bag of dust...twiglet spice!

and the only reason some women had hourglass figures was cos of slightly strange and severe coursetry to warp their body...

wierd!

look at terri hatcher, when she was in superman, she was gorgeous...look at her now, yes, she's thinner, but she looks no where near as beautiful as did then...

whatever their body shape, women should have to feel like they have to conform to a digitally manipulated photo, or strange elongated flamingo like models...

and its a school boy error to stare or look at any other part of a lady if you're taking her out, other than her hands, eyes, and occasionally her bottom when she runs screaming from you at the dinner table..

and anyway, that person you saw doniz, that was me on my day off...

greedoniz wrote:Quite frankly Zack I dont think you have quite got the point of this serious look into makeups role in sociology and how it sometime negates human evolution.

You're right. I apologise. Who am I to make frivolous comments?

I can't even grow a proper moustache.