Briareos wrote:His only mistake was that there is a third variable. The number of cards that you actually give to the spectator at the very end of the trick.
I said that C is variable (or is that not what you meant?). What I didn't properly explain is that Y is actually an unknown number (it varies from performance to performance), but is fixed once the work of the trick starts. The particular version I was thinking of doesn't use a random selection at the start, but Briareos is right that, once you have
your cards or coins, X is a fixed number.
I was keeping the maths simple, including having A=Y, as this follows the procedure of the trick more closely. I don't think reducing the equation actually explains what happens! It's the
process that is confusing, and deliberately so.
Mike - you're absolutely correct, but I was trying to avoid giving too much away. Also, I was explaining exactly how it works mathematically, without revealing the trick to anyone who doesn't know it.
Incidentally, I think this is much more effective with coins (I think Koran called the trick 'Jackpot Coins') and also that you use values, rather than the number of items. Richard Osterlind's performance (as mentioned above) explains why in detail. Again, being on the open forum, I don't want to say too much.