No, not got it yet. I was researching my options back in April when I got sidetracked and never came back to it. I'm easily distracted.
Might pick one up when I get paid, though.
EDIT: Thanks, Jason, for posting that link to your review.
Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
Shufton wrote:Porper box is nice. It is NOT a lippencott box - works on a very different principle. It has drawbacks, but don't they all?
Jason Waskett wrote:Well I'd class it in the same catagory, as it basically does the same thing. I'm not knocking your reasoning, it just seems an obvious way to label it. (I'm not kocking you either, that's not my nature, as I don't know how that last bit reads).
I'll write a review on it, if you can do the same DrTodd then I'll link across to it, if you don't mind, as it's always good to get someone elses opinion, and there's not much written up on it, hence me finding this thread.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests