Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
McCormick hit back, however, telling the paper that “we have been dealing with doubters for ten years. One of the problems we have is that the machine does look a little primitive. We are working on a new model that has flashing lights.”
Ted wrote:This is one of those situations where I simply can't subscribe to the, "everyone is entitled to their beliefs" argument. If Mrs Miggins wants to spend £30 on a bottle of water with a 'memory' or something to relieve a slight case of anxiety then good for her. However, this bomb dowser deal is evil. I don't care if the guy who sells them believes in them or not.
A J Irving wrote:But if the guy has been arrested for fraud then that would imply that these dowsing rods don't actually work. I'm not sure how that fits in with earlier discussions we've had on these boards about these very same devices and dowsing in general. Could someone explain?
Randy wrote:The problem is that with dowsing for water if you don't find anything, you just look silly.
But dowsing for bombs... You end up dead..
The detectors, which consist of a telescopic antenna on a plastic wand, contain nothing more sophisticated than the type of anti-theft tag used to prevent shoplifting, experts said.
ATSC, the British company which sells the devices, claims they use electrostatic magnetic ion attraction to detect guns, ammunition, drugs, explosives, human bodies, and even contraband ivory at distances of up to a kilometre.
But a spokesman for the Department of Business, Innovation, and Skills said, "Tests have shown that the technology used in the ADE-651 and similar devices is not suitable for bomb detection."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest