Top and bottom stock control

Struggling with an effect? Any tips (without giving too much away!) you'd like to share?

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

Top and bottom stock control

Postby Mr Toucan » Aug 4th, '10, 23:28



Hi, does anyone know of a way to control the top four and bottom four cards on a deck without it being a full deck control shuffle?

Any references would be greatly appreciated.

User avatar
Mr Toucan
Full Member
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Jan 16th, '07, 13:09
Location: Highlands (42 : AH)

Postby IanKendall » Aug 4th, '10, 23:55

Seriously?

Cut in half for riffle shuffle. Drop six cards from bottom stock and riffle off. Hold back six cards from top stock.

This can also be done in the hands with an off centre faro.

Ian

IanKendall
Senior Member
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Jun 3rd, '04, 12:03
Location: Edinburgh, (41:WP)

Postby Mr Toucan » Aug 5th, '10, 00:02

Thanks Ian, That's what I use at the moment but I was looking for something a little different, maybe using overhands or strip shuffles - I'm not sure!

User avatar
Mr Toucan
Full Member
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Jan 16th, '07, 13:09
Location: Highlands (42 : AH)

Postby bmat » Aug 5th, '10, 02:48

Card College
Mark Wilson Course in Magic
Counts cuts and moves
Royal Road to card magic

All have what you are looking for. How about a simple overhand false shuffle, can't get more basic then that, you can retain as many cards as you want, or none at all.

Hindu shuffle, same deal as above, all can be found in the four books mentioned above and about a zillion other basic books in card magic.

Thnking about it further, you are probably better off keeping the eight cards together until you need to seperate them and then you can easily use one of the above methods, or drop/or pick up one of the packets in a double undercut.

bmat
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2921
Joined: Jul 27th, '07, 18:44
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Postby Arkesus » Aug 5th, '10, 08:25

Run four cards, throw rest on top.

Shuffle, running last 8.

Run four cards, throw rest on top.

Time Magazines Person Of The Year 2006.
User avatar
Arkesus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Apr 5th, '08, 00:11
Location: Ealing London

Postby daleshrimpton » Aug 5th, '10, 08:47

IanKendall wrote:Seriously?

Cut in half for riffle shuffle. Drop six cards from bottom stock and riffle off. Hold back six cards from top stock.

This can also be done in the hands with an off centre faro.

Ian


This works for me.. been doing it for years, and years.

why complicate things?

you're like Yoda.you dont say much, but what you do say is worth listening to....
Greg Wilson about.... Me.
User avatar
daleshrimpton
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Apr 28th, '03, 08:49
Location: Burnham, Slough Berkshire

Postby Ted » Aug 5th, '10, 09:10

Arkesus wrote:Run four cards, throw rest on top.

Shuffle, running last 8.

Run four cards, throw rest on top.


Nearly. I think the description above would lose the bottom stock when you "throw rest on top".

Run four cards, shuffle most of the rest on top then run the last (>4) few. Repeat as often as necessary.

That's how I would do it, as it looks clean and (most importantly) it's easy.

Ted
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Dec 4th, '08, 00:17
Location: London

Postby Domcsore » Aug 5th, '10, 11:52

bmat wrote:Card College
Mark Wilson Course in Magic
Counts cuts and moves
Royal Road to card magic


I can vouch for Royal Road to Card Magic... great book.

Domcsore
Full Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Jan 25th, '10, 23:05
Location: London, UK, (18 : AH)

Postby Arkesus » Aug 5th, '10, 12:38

Ted wrote:
Arkesus wrote:Run four cards, throw rest on top.

Shuffle, running last 8.

Run four cards, throw rest on top.


Nearly. I think the description above would lose the bottom stock when you "throw rest on top".

Run four cards, shuffle most of the rest on top then run the last (>4) few. Repeat as often as necessary.

That's how I would do it, as it looks clean and (most importantly) it's easy.


I simplified to give the original poster something to work with, but if I am gonna get called on it then I may as well prove my point.
4 Aces on top, 4 kings on bottom. Run aces, throw the entire deck on top, the bottom 8 cards are now K K K K A A A A, shuffle deck and run the last 8 cards, the new top of your deck is A A A A K K K K. Run those four aces and throw the entire deck on top, you now have K K K K, 44 indifferent mixed cards, A A A A at the bottom. Repeat the entire process, (about 10 seconds if that, and you are back to where you started with the four aces on top, and the four kings on the bottom.

Time Magazines Person Of The Year 2006.
User avatar
Arkesus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Apr 5th, '08, 00:11
Location: Ealing London

Postby Ted » Aug 5th, '10, 12:40

Fair point. That makes complete sense (now ;p)

Ted
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Dec 4th, '08, 00:17
Location: London

Postby Arkesus » Aug 5th, '10, 12:44

No probs.

Time Magazines Person Of The Year 2006.
User avatar
Arkesus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Apr 5th, '08, 00:11
Location: Ealing London

Postby Mr Toucan » Aug 5th, '10, 15:31

Thanks Guys for all the help - much appreciated

User avatar
Mr Toucan
Full Member
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Jan 16th, '07, 13:09
Location: Highlands (42 : AH)


Return to Support & Tips

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests