by BigShot » Dec 6th, '10, 02:57
I think the advice you have recieved so far has been good, however, I'd like to temper it a bit with the answer to a similar question I asked someone a while back when I was just starting out in my line of work.
"You can't charge extra for being slow."
That's the problem with looking at a straight hourly rate when starting out in something. You might want to earn £x an hour but if you're slow because you're relatively new to it, that means charging far more than other people who can do the same (or better) in half the time.
When I mentioned the "hourly rate" issue to my mentor back then, he said, quite simply, "If you want a better hourly rate, get better at the job and work faster." which was quite right.
I don't know how much time you've put into the site or how much on-the-job learning you did, but you may well have to take a hit on the hourly rate at first... even if that means taking less than minimum wage.
My suggestion would be to consider what you would have to pay someone else to produce a similar site and (if you like) give some sort of "mates rates" discount.
As for DenmarkKilo's comment, I agree that specialist work shouldn't only fetch minimum wage (subject to the "slow" line above) but cheap doesn't necessarily mean referrals would expect a cheap price.
Just say "I'd usually charge £x for a site like this, but I'll only charge you £y" or some such.