Great Minds Think Alike

Struggling with an effect? Any tips (without giving too much away!) you'd like to share?

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

Great Minds Think Alike

Postby Caligari » May 23rd, '11, 06:56



Mentalists! Do any of you do Punx's Great Minds Think Alike as detailed in Corinda? What a great effect.

Without giving anything away, which brand of paper do you use?

Thanks.

User avatar
Caligari
Full Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Oct 24th, '06, 09:20
Location: Sheffield, UK

Postby phillipnorthfield » May 23rd, '11, 18:42

I've tried it once, but unfortunately it didn't work. Not because they didn't 'notice', but because this being britain, they just thought of another number thinking that they were supposed to.

The negative point to this routine is that there isn't really an out either...

phillipnorthfield
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Feb 15th, '10, 19:44

Postby Flood » May 24th, '11, 00:54

I think this effect sounds great in theory but in the real world I just can't see this being even 50% successful.Then again I havent worked it

Flood
Senior Member
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Jan 17th, '08, 19:17
Location: Dublin,Ireland

Postby Edantes » May 24th, '11, 13:09

I'm not familiar with this effect, what page in Corinda is it on?

User avatar
Edantes
Full Member
 
Posts: 99
Joined: May 9th, '10, 22:21
Location: Newcastle, UK

Postby mindpaul » May 24th, '11, 20:17

I remember when I first read it going out and trying it out on a few unsuspecting people. Success rate at first was not the best. I had to word things very carefully and then my success rate was no better.

mindpaul
Preferred Member
 
Posts: 229
Joined: May 7th, '08, 17:44
Location: Glasgow (38 cp)

Postby Caligari » May 25th, '11, 18:40

Edantes, it's in step 6, p192.

Everyone else, thanks for your replies. I note your critiques of the trick, but still fancy giving it a go. Richard Osterlind does it in his DVD adaptation of 13 Steps (you can find a video on YouTube) and I like the look of it. I'll bear in mind the things you've said though and see if I can think of any ways to up the success rate.

Can you remember what paper you used?

User avatar
Caligari
Full Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Oct 24th, '06, 09:20
Location: Sheffield, UK

Postby SamGurney » May 27th, '11, 13:46

I tried it once and the person noticed. :lol: I laughed it off as though it was a joke and surprisingly got away with it, although I still felt that horrid demotivated feeling after a dreadful performance. That made trying it again somewhat intimidating, but I tried it again anyhow and it still failed. I can't remember what paper I used, but I tried to decypher Corinda and I did use a certain kind of paper for it, if I remember correctly- which I rarley do- it was normal paper the first time and then some kind of slightly glossy one the second.

I don't see why you shouldn't perseveer though. As has been pointed out, Osterlind got it to work and Corinda said that it worked so evidenltly there is something in it worth persuing. It just tends to be the case that the best effects require the most amount of failure to begin with.

''To go wrong in one's own way is better than to go right in another's.'' Dostoevsky's Razumihin.
SamGurney
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Feb 9th, '10, 01:01

Postby Caligari » May 29th, '11, 10:20

Cheers Sam. That was my thinking on it too. If both Osterlind and Corinda thought it was worth it, well ... there's gotta be some way!

User avatar
Caligari
Full Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Oct 24th, '06, 09:20
Location: Sheffield, UK

Postby phillipnorthfield » May 29th, '11, 17:17

Caligari wrote:Cheers Sam. That was my thinking on it too. If both Osterlind and Corinda thought it was worth it, well ... there's gotta be some way!


Oh no, I'm sure it could be made to work. Whether it can be made to be reliable enough to be a worker is something that is more of an issue.

It might be worth looking into making it into a dual reality type routine if you like the effect?

phillipnorthfield
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Feb 15th, '10, 19:44

Postby Caligari » May 30th, '11, 19:27

That's an interesting idea Philip. Thanks.

User avatar
Caligari
Full Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Oct 24th, '06, 09:20
Location: Sheffield, UK

Postby me_simon » Jun 24th, '11, 00:19

Caligari, have you managed to get it working yet?

As others have said, I'm not convinced by it. I just can't help but think people are more cynical these days. You'd need to be confident that the participant truly believed in "ethereal messages". I'm tempted to try it but don't hold out much hope.

User avatar
me_simon
Preferred Member
 
Posts: 232
Joined: May 22nd, '11, 20:06
Location: London, UK (29: AH)

Postby Kroots » Jun 27th, '11, 13:21

I'm pretty sure that Derren did something similar with David Tenant in Trick or Treat. But he got Tenant to draw something and told him that he was going to go up to someone and pretend to read their mind (rather than suggesting that someone was going to read his)

So if you think it about it like that, it makes it logical for the second person to draw whatever they see on the paper rather than question it, as they were under the believe that Tenant was about to read their mind.

This may not be the method Derren used though, but the Punx method is a more than plausible way of doing it, and i'd do it a similar way too.

Kroots
Full Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Jul 2nd, '08, 01:48
Location: London (21:SH)

Postby Caligari » Jul 4th, '11, 15:07

me_simon wrote:I just can't help but think people are more cynical these days. You'd need to be confident that the participant truly believed in "ethereal messages"..


me_simon, I know what you mean about people's cynicism, but I was thinking of a bizzarist presentation anyway which ought to take care of some of that belief deficit.

Kroots wrote:I'm pretty sure that Derren did something similar with David Tenant in Trick or Treat.


Kroots, I remember that - I'll have another look at it and see if I can get any ideas. Thanks.

As for whether I've got it working the answer at the moment is no. I haven't had a chance to seek out any suitable paper, but I have been discussing a similar method with a friend using Post-It Notes. It seems to work well with my partner, but I've yet to road test it on anyone else. It's not quite the same principle, but it has promise. I'll keep you posted. Thanks for your comments people.

User avatar
Caligari
Full Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Oct 24th, '06, 09:20
Location: Sheffield, UK

Postby ace of kev » Jul 5th, '11, 16:41

Kroots wrote:I'm pretty sure that Derren did something similar with David Tenant in Trick or Treat. But he got Tenant to draw something and told him that he was going to go up to someone and pretend to read their mind (rather than suggesting that someone was going to read his)

So if you think it about it like that, it makes it logical for the second person to draw whatever they see on the paper rather than question it, as they were under the believe that Tenant was about to read their mind.

This may not be the method Derren used though, but the Punx method is a more than plausible way of doing it, and i'd do it a similar way too.


If my memory serves me correctly, it was a cat was it not? Derren has people draw cats in a few of his shows.....

User avatar
ace of kev
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1835
Joined: Sep 20th, '05, 20:52
Location: Dundee/Glasgow (AH:20)


Return to Support & Tips

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests