by bmat » Jul 29th, '11, 17:54
It was akward. Don't hate me actually you can hate me thats is up to you, but I will try to help, although you may not like it.
There is nothing wrong with your method, it was clean, it was pretty smooth and it got the job done.
I should point out that the method for this particular version of the trick was poor, but you did a great job with what you had to work with. Meaning while I love this type of effect, there are far better methods that will enable you to do the exact same thing. Perhaps if this effect was put in the middle of a routine it would be better.
Your first issue was the initial display of the aces. What an odd way to show four cards and because there was nothing before we can't exactly see what is 'normal' for you. So there is suspicion from the get go.
A better way, (if it works with your method) is to have the aces in the deck to begin with turn the deck towards you and as you fan through the cards upjog the aces, once you have found all four remove them together and then slide them into that akward display, (that is if you must use that display). Because really who starts out with the four cards held that way?
Secondly I can see what you are doing. You don't have to tell me every detail. This is a common error so don't worry about it, just fix it. It makes for a very boring effect.
I'll try for an example here of what would be better.
Take out the cards, show four aces.
"four aces, loved by gamblers and magicians all over the world. Doesn't matter what you do with them" at this point they go face down on top of the deck but don't tell them that just do it! 'cause if your good with cards...or a magician, they always come when called' During this patter the four cards go face down onto the table, again don't explain it, just do it.
"First ace, or bullet as the old timers called them goes to the bottom, with a snap of the fingers and a flick of the wrist it jumps to the top, the second goes in reverse" Suit your words to actions. See what I am doing? I am not just telling you what I am doing as I'm doing it, I'm telling a story. The description is in the story.
The problem with describing what you are doing while you are doing it is that the trick does not engage the audience and at that point they are free to think about method rather than be involved in the effect. So they will begin to wonder things like, 'why are the aces face down? I never really saw the aces except at the very beginning. When the audience cannot engage, your routine is in trouble.
In the middle of the routine you attempted to show the ace going into the deck, but you never really showed the ace, it looked like you were trying hide the card rather than show it. Either show it, or don't show it. If you insist on trying that gambit then you have to go about it correctly. You can't say, 'See the Ace is going into the deck" and then try to show an ace that really isn't an ace' What you have to do is pause, look the spectator in the eye and causually flip the deck so they see what the presume to be an ace out of the corner of their eye. But it has to be really smooth and done on an off beat and you have to have great amounts of courage and a wee bit of faith.
All this could be avoided of course by using a different method for this type of effect. There are lots of them out there, keep on trying till you find one that works for you. Mark Wilson's Course in Magic has a few alternatives.
As I said in the begining, you did it, and thats the first step. Congrats and I really think with a little seasoning you will do very well. Keep up the good work.
If you managed to read through all my drivel then thanks for reading.
Brian