by BigShot » Nov 7th, '11, 20:30
"The police don't always" - that's half the problem.
In fact, if your story is accurate (and I have no reason to think otherwise) the police were WAY out of line. By the sound of it, your reaction fit every definition I've ever heard of "reasonable" except those used by pacifists who want us all to refuse to fight back, and by the police who fell they are entitled to hold a monopoly on violence.
Under my "asking for it" law, you would have been given a pat on the back for keeping him there, and if anything you may have been given a bit of advice about the law so that next time you'd remember to hurt him far more as, after all, he was asking for it.
To my previous comments about the problem being that we've been disarmed and dicouraged from defending ourselves, eachother and our property - add a firm belief that the police are actually part of the problem. "Just let us handle it" is one of the worst attitudes about crime imaginable; it not only suggests that we should surrender our defence to them, but it does so when it's undisputable that they can't "handle it" at all. The only thing policing really does to crime is displace it.