Scientific solution

Struggling with an effect? Any tips (without giving too much away!) you'd like to share?

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

Scientific solution

Postby TheStoner » Nov 25th, '11, 15:29



Just been going through some old coin gaffs and found the 2p shell from a CU with a normal 10p firmly wedged inside it. The 10p won't come out whatever I try so, as a last resort, I'm going to apply some O-level science and try to use heat/cold to solve the problem with the vague hope that the shell or coin will expand/shrink enough to get them apart. Can any scientific types suggest whether extreme heat or extreme cold is likely to work best? Thanks!

User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Re: Scientific solution

Postby Jean » Nov 25th, '11, 15:35

Heat causes metal to expand.

Invoke not reason. In the end it is too small a deity.
User avatar
Jean
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sep 8th, '08, 01:15

Re: Scientific solution

Postby TheStoner » Nov 25th, '11, 16:11

Jean Eugene Roberts wrote:Heat causes metal to expand.


True, but the 2p and 10p are both metal. The question is will one expand (or in extreme cold shrink) faster than the other making it possible to get them apart. If the 10p expands slightly quicker than the 2p then heat will make the problem worse rather than better.

Last edited by TheStoner on Nov 25th, '11, 16:38, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Re: Scientific solution

Postby Grimshaw » Nov 25th, '11, 16:23

The copper 2p should expand more than a stainless steel 10p due to thermal expansion when subjected to heat, if memory serves and theory is correct.

User avatar
Grimshaw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sep 19th, '07, 18:25

Re: Scientific solution

Postby Rob » Nov 25th, '11, 16:31

Is the 2p Shimmed/Attractive?

If so, have you tried supergluing the 10 to a flat surface, and using a large Neo, to see if that would pull the shell away?

User avatar
Rob
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2535
Joined: Feb 14th, '06, 13:30
Location: Hull, United Kingdom (42 - SH)

Re: Scientific solution

Postby TheStoner » Nov 25th, '11, 16:39

Grimshaw wrote:The copper 2p should expand more than a stainless steel 10p due to thermal expansion when subjected to heat, if memory serves and theory is correct.


OK - I'll go and try it and then report back...

User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Re: Scientific solution

Postby Tomo » Nov 25th, '11, 16:41

magicrob wrote:Is the 2p Shimmed/Attractive?

If so, have you tried supergluing the 10 to a flat surface, and using a large Neo, to see if that would pull the shell away?

The head of a "clout" nail should serve well as a flat surface.

Image
User avatar
Tomo
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 9866
Joined: May 4th, '05, 23:46
Location: Darkest Cheshire (forty-bloody-six going on six)

Re: Scientific solution

Postby TonyB » Nov 26th, '11, 03:38

Go with cold, but the superglue and the magnet are a far better suggestion.

User avatar
TonyB
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1523
Joined: Apr 6th, '09, 15:58
Location: Ireland

Re: Scientific solution

Postby magicarp » Nov 28th, '11, 12:45

well if you dont mind losing the 10p, here is my solution:

1) buy kiln
2) pre-heat to 1150 C
3) insert coin+shell
4) wait for a bit
5) pour out 10p
6) leave shell to cool

at this temperature, the shell should stay intact, but the 10p should melt (assuming wikipedia has correct data).

for kiln buying advice please go to: http://www.bigceramicstore.com/Informat ... a_kiln.htm

an elegant solution I'm sure you will all agree :D

User avatar
magicarp
Full Member
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Oct 29th, '11, 20:25
Location: Banbury

Re: Scientific solution

Postby Rob » Nov 28th, '11, 12:51

magicarp wrote:well if you dont mind losing the 10p, here is my solution:

1) buy kiln
2) pre-heat to 1150 C
3) insert coin+shell
4) wait for a bit
5) pour out 10p
6) leave shell to cool

at this temperature, the shell should stay intact, but the 10p should melt (assuming wikipedia has correct data).

for kiln buying advice please go to: http://www.bigceramicstore.com/Informat ... a_kiln.htm" target="_blank

an elegant solution I'm sure you will all agree :D


Aren't kilns a bit on the pricey-side, though? :shock: :lol:

User avatar
Rob
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2535
Joined: Feb 14th, '06, 13:30
Location: Hull, United Kingdom (42 - SH)

Re: Scientific solution

Postby TheStoner » Nov 28th, '11, 14:04

magicarp wrote:well if you dont mind losing the 10p, here is my solution:

1) buy kiln
2) pre-heat to 1150 C
3) insert coin+shell
4) wait for a bit
5) pour out 10p
6) leave shell to cool

at this temperature, the shell should stay intact, but the 10p should melt (assuming wikipedia has correct data).

for kiln buying advice please go to: http://www.bigceramicstore.com/Informat ... a_kiln.htm" target="_blank

an elegant solution I'm sure you will all agree :D


Might have to try this - nothing else has worked!

User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Re: Scientific solution

Postby magicarp » Nov 28th, '11, 17:13

obviously buying a new shell would be cheaper, but that would be admitting defeat!
#rob: yeah kilns are a bit pricey, but I've got two words for you: POTTERY MAGIC. I can feel teh future of magic shifting as I type. Think of the possilities open to a magician with the ability to make their own, customised, clay pots!

User avatar
magicarp
Full Member
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Oct 29th, '11, 20:25
Location: Banbury


Return to Support & Tips

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

cron