Card Stunts or In the Trenches

Struggling with an effect? Any tips (without giving too much away!) you'd like to share?

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

Card Stunts or In the Trenches

Postby ace of kev » Jan 1st, '06, 23:45



I hav been looking around at reviews and stuff for both of these DVDs, Card Stunts with Gregory Wilson and In The Trenches with Paul Green.

I am going to get them both, but I don't have enough to but them both at the moment, but what one do you think is better, so that I can get the best one first :D

User avatar
ace of kev
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1835
Joined: Sep 20th, '05, 20:52
Location: Dundee/Glasgow (AH:20)

Postby rcarlsen » Jan 2nd, '06, 01:50

In the trenches is great.

User avatar
rcarlsen
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1010
Joined: May 23rd, '05, 09:12
Location: Oslo, Norway

Postby ace of kev » Jan 2nd, '06, 02:04

Ok Thanks :D I am swaying towards 'In the Trenches' just so I can do Jeopardy :wink:

In the Trenches: 1
Card Stunts: 0

User avatar
ace of kev
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1835
Joined: Sep 20th, '05, 20:52
Location: Dundee/Glasgow (AH:20)

Postby GoldFish » Jan 3rd, '06, 14:59

In The Trenches is a really good DVD but you have to bear in mind that there's not very much truely original material on there. It's all Paul Green's handlings for other peoples' ideas. Jeopardy is a fantastic effect though and probably worth the price of the DVD anyway.

Most Greg Wilson stuff is fantastic, but I don't really know about Card Stunts, but I've heard good things.

All the best,

Will Wood
User avatar
GoldFish
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Mar 15th, '04, 16:10
Location: Malawi 25:AH

Postby bananafish » Jan 3rd, '06, 15:09

Jeopardy is a fantastic effect though and probably worth the price of the DVD anyway.


I was always put off jeopardy on the grounds that most british people have never seen the American TV program it is formulated around. I concluded that other versions of Shuffle Bored (the effect it is based on) work better for UK audiences?

I could of course be wrong though as I have never actually seen the Jeopardy effect. It is certainly always well spoken of.

And having said all that though I am eagerly looking forward to seeing Paul Green at Blackpool this year. His reputation is awesome.

User avatar
bananafish
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 5821
Joined: Apr 22nd, '03, 09:43
Location: Simon Shaw. Suffolk, UK (50:SH)

Postby ace of kev » Jan 3rd, '06, 15:15

bananafish wrote:I was always put off jeopardy on the grounds that most british people have never seen the American TV program it is formulated around.


You can just change the patter to the effect :D

I read your review on In the Trenches Goldfish, and that is what made me think about it. I think I will just get In the Trenches 1st then :D

Thanks everyone :wink:

User avatar
ace of kev
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1835
Joined: Sep 20th, '05, 20:52
Location: Dundee/Glasgow (AH:20)

Postby GoldFish » Jan 3rd, '06, 23:32

bananafish wrote:I was always put off jeopardy on the grounds that most british people have never seen the American TV program it is formulated around. I concluded that other versions of Shuffle Bored (the effect it is based on) work better for UK audiences?


That's very true. When I first performed this effect I was using the original patter, and people had no idea what I was going on about, so I changed the presentation to focus purely on the impossibility of the prediction. I should have mentioned that, before I bought In The Trenches I was unaware of the effect Jeopardy was based on, and that's why I'd say it was worth the price.

Don't get me wrong there are some great routines on the DVD but like I said it's not the most original in the world.

All the best,

Will Wood
User avatar
GoldFish
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Mar 15th, '04, 16:10
Location: Malawi 25:AH

Postby ace of kev » Jan 3rd, '06, 23:42

Ok thanks :D

User avatar
ace of kev
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1835
Joined: Sep 20th, '05, 20:52
Location: Dundee/Glasgow (AH:20)

Postby shanester » Jan 22nd, '06, 17:31

Jeopardy is a good effect that can simply be used as an impossible prediction (doesn't need the Jeopardy tag).
It does have a problem though- people need to be able to perform a riffle shuffle without turning half of the deck over. I have performed this with people who can riffle, but they are obviously not as smooth as we card handlers and they fumble with setting the two halves a bit. If they do happen to accidentally turn one half over, it is without them even realising that they have done this. You must watch them doing their shuffle and be prepared to correct them (although this look a bit suspicious).
If you have Mnemonica and like a stack then Control in Chaos can be done in the same manner but allows the spectator to cut however much they want to.

The rest of In the Trenches is great. Paul Green has clearly put a lot of work into his presentations to make them amusing and entertaining.

His sponge ball routine is excellent and can easily be adapted to a totally in the hands routine.

I don't do a rope routine but I would do the one on the DVD if I did.

Above Beside Below is a very useable coins across (based on Roth's version). I don't do the Jumbo kicker though

If you want a version of Anniversary Waltz with an ungimmicked deck then Coming Together is pretty good (although I prefer Hula Fusion by Carl Andrews)

Mission Impossible shows that an Ambitious Card routine can have a point to it.

There's loads of great stuff on this DVD. It's one of the best that I've ever bought (and you get to watch Paul's classic force in action- it's a thing of beauty)

Cheers

Shanester

shanester
Preferred Member
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Jan 19th, '06, 15:03
Location: Newcastle

Re: Card Stunts or In the Trenches

Postby Zero000 » Jan 22nd, '06, 21:08

ace of kev wrote:I hav been looking around at reviews and stuff for both of these DVDs, Card Stunts with Gregory Wilson and In The Trenches with Paul Green.

I am going to get them both, but I don't have enough to but them both at the moment, but what one do you think is better, so that I can get the best one first :D

hmm, funny i've been having the same diliema as you, but in the end i decided not to get any of them cause im broke... :(

?!~

For crying out loud, the msn button under my name is to talk about magic with me, NOT A FREE MAGIC GIVEAWAY LINK. dont abuse it
Zero000
Senior Member
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sep 6th, '05, 07:59
Location: Virginia, US (17:SH)

Postby ace of kev » Jan 22nd, '06, 23:15

Well, I had round about £30 until today, spent about £20 in Glasgow at the Cinema and KFC :(

I think I still have enough, but the reason that I haven't bought them yet is that I need to use my Dad's credit card, and I keep forgetting to ask him when I am on the phone to him :evil:

User avatar
ace of kev
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1835
Joined: Sep 20th, '05, 20:52
Location: Dundee/Glasgow (AH:20)

Postby Zero000 » Jan 23rd, '06, 00:42

!!! kfc doesnt cost that much. but the theaters do. they rip you off like 10 dollars US.

ace, open up a paypal account and get their free debit card. hehehe :D

?!~

For crying out loud, the msn button under my name is to talk about magic with me, NOT A FREE MAGIC GIVEAWAY LINK. dont abuse it
Zero000
Senior Member
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sep 6th, '05, 07:59
Location: Virginia, US (17:SH)

Postby dat8962 » Jan 24th, '06, 19:58

I saw an effect yesterday that was very similar to Jeopary except that it was accompanied by a small book that read as a story about a baby rabbit that dropped a deck of cards. The story revealed which cards were face up, their colour, suit etc.

Using the book seemed like a nice effect but I couldn;t help wondering if there's sufficient difference for it not be considered a blatent copy.

Member of the Magic Circle & The 2009 British Isles Close-Up Magician of the Year
It's not really an optical illusion - it just looks like one!
User avatar
dat8962
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 9265
Joined: Jan 29th, '04, 19:19
Location: Leamington Spa (50:Semi-Pro)

Postby shanester » Jan 25th, '06, 10:46

Have seen this effect and it's ok. I know someone who uses it and he says it gets great reactions (as do all of these effects that are based on shuffle-bored).
Not sure what you mean about it being a rip off, it is a different presentational device thereby making it an original slant on what has become a classic effect.

shanester
Preferred Member
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Jan 19th, '06, 15:03
Location: Newcastle

Postby dat8962 » Jan 25th, '06, 19:46

I have to say that I don't know the origins of Jeopardy or the shuffle for that matter.

I was assuming (which I shouldn't do :oops: ) that it was so close to Jeopardy that it could be considered as a copy, but I do see your point about the originality of the book.

I can't quite make my mind up about this one but it was a nice trick. Not mindblowing but nice........

Member of the Magic Circle & The 2009 British Isles Close-Up Magician of the Year
It's not really an optical illusion - it just looks like one!
User avatar
dat8962
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 9265
Joined: Jan 29th, '04, 19:19
Location: Leamington Spa (50:Semi-Pro)

Next

Return to Support & Tips

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron