A meeting area where members can relax, chill out and talk about anything non magical. 
			Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by Pitto » Feb 17th, '06, 21:39
by Pitto » Feb 17th, '06, 21:39 
			
			I hope I dont look stupid because im missing a joke but x= 5
			
		 
		
			
			- 
				Pitto
			
- Senior Member
-  
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Nov 1st, '05, 23:08
- Location: Stockport (16:AH)
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by Arthur » Feb 17th, '06, 22:18
by Arthur » Feb 17th, '06, 22:18 
			
			Instead of having "answers" on a math test, they should just call them "impressions," and if you got a different "impression," so what, can't we all be brothers?
- Jack Handey
			
		 
		
			
			- 
				 
 Arthur
- Junior Member
-  
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Jan 11th, '06, 21:02
- Location: Kent, UK
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by dat8962 » Feb 17th, '06, 23:43
by dat8962 » Feb 17th, '06, 23:43 
			
			I thought that it was a marvelous piece of wit  

Member of the Magic Circle & The 2009 British Isles Close-Up Magician of the Year
It's not really an optical illusion - it just looks like one!
		 
		
			
			- 
				 
 dat8962
- Veteran Member
-  
- Posts: 9265
- Joined: Jan 29th, '04, 19:19
- Location: Leamington Spa (50:Semi-Pro)
- 
				
			
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by Larry » Feb 18th, '06, 12:19
by Larry » Feb 18th, '06, 12:19 
			
			wonder if i could get away with anything like this in my maths degree.
also, is it worrying that i didn't have to actually do any sums to actually solve it? do i stare at these triangles too much? i think so!
i had a question this week which was a sort of "derive someone-or-others equation and use it to prove some-identity" and i thought, errr... i know the answer i just don't know how to prove it... bu**er.
so i waffled on for about a page then put =answer!
can't wait to see how many marks i get for that
			
		 
		
			
			- 
				Larry
			
-  
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by tiggy49 » Feb 18th, '06, 13:09
by tiggy49 » Feb 18th, '06, 13:09 
			
			haha it took me a while to get that one coz i figured out the answer first instead of actually looking at it
			
		 
		
			
			- 
				 
 tiggy49
- Preferred Member
-  
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Jan 28th, '06, 21:12
- Location: Preston
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by Tomo » Feb 18th, '06, 13:26
by Tomo » Feb 18th, '06, 13:26 
			
			[suddenly gets it and slaps forehead] Doh!
			
		 
		
			
			- 
				 
 Tomo
- Veteran Member
-  
- Posts: 9866
- Joined: May 4th, '05, 23:46
- Location: Darkest Cheshire (forty-bloody-six going on six)
- 
				
			
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by Johndoe » Feb 18th, '06, 16:19
by Johndoe » Feb 18th, '06, 16:19 
			
			Larry wrote:also, is it worrying that i didn't have to actually do any sums to actually solve it? do i stare at these triangles too much?
I only did maths to GCSE and I even I know it's a 3 4 5 triangle. However the guys answer is technically correct.
 
		
			
			- 
				Johndoe
			
-  
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by ace of kev » Feb 18th, '06, 22:23
by ace of kev » Feb 18th, '06, 22:23 
			
			I just know to use Pythagoras' Theorm (or however you spell it)
			
		 
		
			
			- 
				 
 ace of kev
- Advanced Member
-  
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Sep 20th, '05, 20:52
- Location: Dundee/Glasgow (AH:20)
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by Pitto » Feb 18th, '06, 23:39
by Pitto » Feb 18th, '06, 23:39 
			
			Oh I  was really being so thick thats funny (so thick)
Pitto
			
		 
		
			
			- 
				Pitto
			
- Senior Member
-  
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Nov 1st, '05, 23:08
- Location: Stockport (16:AH)
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by tiggy49 » Feb 19th, '06, 13:42
by tiggy49 » Feb 19th, '06, 13:42 
			
			ace of kev wrote:I just know to use Pythagoras' Theorm (or however you spell it)
you dont need to use pythagras! look properly u need to find 'x' not the value of 'x'. dont worry took me a while to get it as well
 
		
			
			- 
				 
 tiggy49
- Preferred Member
-  
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Jan 28th, '06, 21:12
- Location: Preston
 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by ace of kev » Feb 19th, '06, 14:37
by ace of kev » Feb 19th, '06, 14:37 
			
			tiggy49 wrote:ace of kev wrote:I just know to use Pythagoras' Theorm (or however you spell it)
you dont need to use pythagras! look properly u need to find 'x' not the value of 'x'. dont worry took me a while to get it as well
 
I know that LOL
I meant to find the value of 'x' 

 
		
			
			- 
				 
 ace of kev
- Advanced Member
-  
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Sep 20th, '05, 20:52
- Location: Dundee/Glasgow (AH:20)
 
	 
	
	
	
	Return to The Dove's Head
	
	Who is online
	Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests