by Craig Browning » Jun 8th, '06, 19:04
To best respond to this question one must be able to define what it means to be “Psychic”. Are you clinging to the boogieman ideas surrounding the term or the more analytical points of what it infers?
Edgar Cayce, one of history’s most noted Psychics explained that he believed psychic ability related to nothing more than being able to see things in the mundane world that the average person ignores and which is thus “invisible” to them. We find similar explanations in the annals of Occult and Metaphysical literature as well as lore & myth when it comes to the powers and abilities of the Seer and Soothsayer – all of whom had the ability to “read” the signs.
What signs?
How about what was accepted and implied by this or that critter in a field or bird flying over head, the number of items and the types of items, their distance to or fro from you, etc? All of these as “signs” and “symbols” – a language understood by those that studied the craft but not to the average everyday human being. Thus, it is occult lore or esoteric knowledge – a science and art known only to those that had proven themselves worthy and capable of understanding and properly employing such things (for the sake of the greater good of all vs. self-advancement, domination, ill-gotten influence, etc.)
Now, I’ve invested decades of my life into the study of the human animal, nature, symbolism, psychology and ideomotor happenstance (for lack of a better term – what Dr. Paul Ekman & company refer to as FACS and loosely, what Richard Busch refers to in both The Destiny Response and his new book The Busch Factor). Based on this alone, I’d have to say that YES, I’m very much as Psychic or “Mystic” in that I’ve passed through the rites of initiation, proven myself worthy and have graduated into the deeper realms of study; I am exactly what was once looked upon by our ancestors as being a Wise-ard (Wizard) – a learned elder within the village or “wise one”. Like Merlin himself, I know how to look at things from a unique point of view and in so doing, make the seemingly impossible (based on the common human’s point of view) possible; everything from engineering feats to apparently healing the ill.
The thing we must look at, at least in my mind, is “does knowing the secret behind something detract from its effectiveness or how it is perceived by others?”
Just because I know the methods, the very same methods stolen by the Mental Health industry from the esoteric world I might add, does not negate the fact that the average human being will still view what I do as being “Psychic” Again however, we must clarify…
Being Psychic has nothing to do with special powers or anything “super” natural; it is 100% natural and employs little other than logic, intuition and a bit of imagination. It is the combination of these three things that bring about the more common manifestations the public views (wrongly) as being “Psychic”. Bear in mind, a person with a near photographic memory is seen as being “Psychic” just as a person capable of forecasting something as trivial as the weather based on what the leaves on plants and certain insects are doing – these are people that know the signs and nothing more. Myth, religious propaganda, ignorance and of course the tall tales of storytellers are what have imposed around this idea seriously misleading points of misinterpretation/ misrepresentation. Add to this those caught up in the delusion – the fantasy of being “psychic” based not on truth but on lore.
“But what about those that move things with their mind or who speak with the dead?”
Most telekinetic (psychokinetic) manifestations can be explained away via ideomotor response. The act of bending keys & flatware can be traced in origin to an early 20th century magic book e.g. I give such things little to no credence when it comes to “legitimate” Psi study and manifestation (other than in haunted sites… in which I’ve gotten my fair share of “the willies” as they say).
Speaking with the Dead is a seriously “tricky” subject (no pun intended) in that I’ve had two experiences in which I felt what certain Trance Channels have described, when a spirit “takes you over”. For that reason I tend to hold some reservations on the issue in that I know there are times information can come through us “from the other side” (?) that is applicable to the sitter or whomever that is with us. However, I am also inclined to believe that 95% of those claiming to be a Trance Channel is nothing but a money grabbing fake; again, it’s based on my experiences in such things. Simply put, I can’t imagine anyone wanting to feel that helpless and out of control of their own body or as “invaded” as I felt on those two particular occasions. It’s creepy! I don’t like it and I most certainly don’t understand it (analytically). I know it is possible but I also know that most who claim to do it aren’t for real and it’s a hustle.
In that this is something that comes up along with the original question I’m addressing it here, suggesting that if you wish to hold to the Psychic image for reasons already outlined, then you may wish to learn about doing Guided Séance sessions similar to that offered by Bro. Shadow in HAVE SÉANCE WILL TRAVEL. This way the onness is on the sitter not you and there is no sense of “trickery” involved. Just know that you will have people asking if you can help them speak with dead people… it’s a growing trend in our world these days and you need to be ready for it. BTW… a look at Docc Hilford’s $1,000.00 Séance manuscript will reveal to you just how lucrative the private Séance operation can be, so don’t sell this short based on certain industry based bias that has strings attached.
Richard Webster’s position on this is the best, why fight the image given to you by the public? They want to see you as being a gifted Psychic and if you want to work more and see a steady return, they you are going to allow for that image to exist in their minds, its part of the craft.
Stephan Minch pointed out nearly 30 years ago that most that have difficulty in accepting this “Psychic” image are magicians still stuck in the rut of “magician’s guilt” – individuals that will never “make it” as solid psychic entertainers in that they are not willing to walk the infamous tightrope this side of the craft demands of its artists.
Yes, we have a plethora of “experts” out there today who are saying that it’s really ok to sell yourself as a “fake” psychic and the old adage that “NO ONE WANTS TO HIRE A FAKE MIND READER” is bogus. We keep seeing fingers pointed to Derren Brown and others, denoting their success as openly admitted fakes. But, our contemporaries aren’t telling you about how much harder it is to get those gigs that pay the big bucks and deliver you the recognition at those levels. They don’t tell you about the calloused and cut-throat world of show biz and how you must buy your celebrity in order to obtain it. Nor do they explain to you that once the current trend dies (which it is doing at present) you will be nothing more than another magician with a bunch of over-done tricks with nowhere to go. Believe me, you will not be welcomed too readily into the New Age and Spiritually oriented markets jerks like I work in and are able to hold to a steady schedule doing… all because we allow people to assume what they will and, by way of a logical and common explanation, admit to being exactly what they perceive – a genuine Psychic.
I can make that claim with a straight face and without guilt. More important, I’m able to educate my public in how I see that term and how I feel it applies to me; doing so in a way that enlightens them to the role of the delusional believer as well as the charlatan. I’m also able to take away from them the whole boogieman or ET connections to the P word and in so doing, accomplish more good at invoking critical thought, that all the blasting and insults put forth in past years by Randi and his apostles combined. In other words, I can use our agreement (honey) to attract the bees (gain investment from the audience) and help them see things more realistically and on their own terms vs. the vinegar & bitters approach offered by my critics and detractors. One method has proven to work quite well over the years while the other has only resulted in division, hurt feelings, lost friendships and bitter contempt.
Enough said for now…