by Renato » Aug 8th, '08, 19:09
The effect was lovely.
Your opening remarks were somewhat clunky - there wasn't the rhythm needed for the back and forth aspect. Also I'm not sure whether the comments about Psychology etc. were supposed to be a parody of Dezzer's statement or were just derivative; if the former you should make it more obvious you're parodying his remarks and if the letter I'd be tempted to drop them entirely. Find your own statement if you have one at all, or at the very least provide some pseudo-explanation of where the psychology and suggestion came into play, how you managed to influence his choice of number etc. Otherwise they're redundant.
Nerves showed through a little with the uncertain chuckling at some of the comments you made and the constant movement, which detracted a little from the professionalism of it all.
But yes, the effect was very nice! Certainly wasn't expecting the denouement to happen as it did!