by Part-Timer » Sep 12th, '08, 20:56
Now I see where all the extra time comes from!
Sorry, but I still don't think the effect works, either in the context of the rest of the performance, or for a stage environment.
In many respects, I think Memory Lapse is best done 'one-on-one', because the effect only really plays for that person. In theory, it should work for others, based on the participant's reaction, but I just can't see it coming across right on stage. Do you really think that getting people in the front row to turn round and start talking to the people behind them is good theatre? It'll be disruptive, and likely to weaken an effect that's already slightly diluted for the reason I gave.
Of course, it might work just fine on stage; it's certainly possible to use other people's reactions to make effects 'play big'.
My real concern is that it will quite clearly be a trick, sandwiched as it is between things that are clearly magic tricks. I think that's aproblem not only from the point of view of Memory Lapse itself, but also for your act as a whole.
Many performers (including some of the great mentalists) mixed magic and mind reading in one programme. I'm fairly sure that this particular effect sits badly in a programme of stage magic. The prediction trick is fine.
I am also sticking to my guns about the use of music. How are you going to explain what is going on (you're on stage), while the music plays? If the music started after you've made your explanation (it is part of the process of forgetting, if you like), then I think it might be OK.