Mr_Grue wrote:DenmarkKilo wrote:I sadly don't have a WaG
Sorry to pick up up on this, but the singular of WaGs can't be WaG. Wives and Girlfriends; wife or girlfriend.
Oh.
Never mind. As you were.
Wives and Girlfriends: How much do they know?
Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
35 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
by cymru1991 » Jan 8th, '09, 17:17
Farlsborough wrote:Mr_Grue wrote:DenmarkKilo wrote:I sadly don't have a WaG
Sorry to pick up up on this, but the singular of WaGs can't be WaG. Wives and Girlfriends; wife or girlfriend.
Oh.
Never mind. As you were.
Well you can't exactly put WoG can you?
James, 19, Lifelong student of magic and will carry on learning for the rest of my days if I'm a very lucky boy.
-
cymru1991 - Senior Member
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Jun 28th, '07, 13:10
- Location: UK (32: SH) -Cardician
by DenmarkKilo » Jan 8th, '09, 22:25
Going from the font of all knowledge - Wikidictionarybookonline.com/Wags...
So technically, I'm right in the usage of Wag, but wrong in the usage of WaG. I thought it was best used in the same way as WoW (World of Warcraft), but that's incorrect.
Dear Web, Why do I love and hate you simultaneously, sincerely, Me...
In 2006 it was generally printed as "WAGs", but a singular, "Wag" or "WAG", quickly came into vogue (even though the singular form would logically be "wife or girlfriend", reading as "WOG"); for example: "any additional pounds she gained during Wag drinking sessions";[2] "a property heiress, model and actress, appears a likely sports WAG"
So technically, I'm right in the usage of Wag, but wrong in the usage of WaG. I thought it was best used in the same way as WoW (World of Warcraft), but that's incorrect.
Dear Web, Why do I love and hate you simultaneously, sincerely, Me...
Watching: Jeeves and Wooster
-
DenmarkKilo - Senior Member
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Sep 9th, '08, 23:29
- Location: South Wales, UK (33:AH)
35 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests
