Ho ho, didn't realise how much things had taken off since my post! Might I be allowed another, Mr. Mandrake? (As long as it's not
too inflammatory...)
Craig Browning wrote:I wish to apologies up front to everyone but I believe you can see where I made an point about bear poking before asked to flesh out things. This thread was moving along all fine and dandy until someone had to slam Readers...
Craig, of course my post was meant to poke the bear, we both know that

But this was my reason: your point above (that everything was fine until someone "slammed" readers) is simply untrue. Everything was fine - FOR YOU!
This thread was started about the horrific "witch burnings" in Africa. Yet in just a little more than a page you have managed to shoe horn in your irrelevant opinions; how you
loathe organised religion and see it as a "politically based game playing in which ego and arrogance replace both, faith and adherence to the theology and idealism said tradition is based upon." Although you mention several faiths, quarter of your post refers to the church (i.e. Christianity) in which you state that "hypocrisy is it's cornerstone" - a totally subjective opinion - as a fact.
I haven't hidden my beliefs on Talkmagic. I really do try not to "ram them down peoples throats" (the easiest of easy accusations to make

). But given that I am, I expect, a minority on here in my beliefs, and that they affect my life and the lives of many I see around me in a very positive way, could you try to understand that I may feel like defending a body of people that I belong to? Or, if it's fitting (and I think it was a perfectly logical counter argument/question), to suggest that these accusations you make could be laid just as easily at your door as mine?
I'm honestly not trying to stir up animosity! But if someone makes a lengthy post that is derogatory several times over to a group that they know for sure exist on this forum - even just one or two - and I muster a response, I hardly think it's fair that I be blamed for "setting things off". There are plenty of times when comments one could choose to take umbrage at have been made and in the spirit of things - and because TM is such a friendly place generally - I've happily shrugged them off. But the hijacking of a thread for irrelevant sh*t-talking of someone's beliefs is just not cricket.
I'm happy to admit I don't have an in depth knowledge about Readers, though I don't see why it should stop me asking questions. But I also know that a brief stint of scriptural study does not (evidently) make one an expert in the field of faith and religion. What amuses me all the more is that several times Craig, you have accused religious leaders of being ego-driven. I'm sure many are. But I also know many church leaders who are as humble and selfless a person as you will ever meet, and I also expect that someone searching this forum for all of your posts will have cause to believe that there are Readers with buckets of ego to spare as well.
I half understand your intense dislike; frankly, many British Christians cringe a great deal of the time when we see or hear about the activities of our American counterparts too. But amongst all this hypocrisy, power-struggling and ego tripping you insist is the backbone of my faith and others, there are Christians quietly getting on with their lives, who - inspired by their faith and gently led by their leaders - are befriending and helping prostitutes and providing infinitely patient support to alcoholics (if you've worked with alcoholics you'll know what I mean by infinitely patient) to name just two of the social actions performed by my own church. But apparently, you are absolutely certain God is nowhere in this picture.
Well, I disagree with you - I'm pretty sure I'm allowed to do that
