SamGurney wrote:That.. and the Berglas effect.
haha!

Craig, whilst you are writing your essays on what constitutes as magic or not, I'm out being paid £300 an hour to perform this "magic trick", whilst being hired as a "mind reader". Anywho, some of your ideas are really interesting. I was especially interested by .robb.'s idea - I'm sure you can imagine how frustrating some stuff can be to come up with! But to do it through a magic trick itself? Nice thinking!
TonyB...you've got me thinking now!
Demitri. I set myself some rules 2 years ago - it had to be completely impromptu, reason being is that I'm in an environment at house parties etc at university whereby I don't go planning to perform. The last thing I want is to be drunk, get the urge, and have to go upstairs and fiddle with a magnet and a magnetic coin.
Secondly, it had to be a simple "that hand", "that hand" - not a "I will write down what hand it is in" or "I will put a coin in my hand and it will match the hand yours is in". This is because, in my mind, if you can genuinely do what you say you can do, it would be clean, simple, and not at all complex.
Thirdly, it had to be three-phase - I'm not stopping at 2!
Fouthly, and most importantly, it had to be fullproof. As though I were using a magnet, but not!
As I said...I'm at 2 phases

Finally...Tomo? You've given me a funny idea...