Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
stevebo wrote:Just to be picky, it's spelt Schumacher! lol
Well... XCM to me is purely an art form. Although this place is a place of magic, I feel that XCM can also be related back to magic if used in the right context. e.g. In my video, the molecule II cut is a false cut and the molecule II Ace Production can be used in conjunction with other tricks such as the Asher Twist (which can be performed in real life really well in good angles!!).
I'm more of a magician myself, but XCM is a hobby and art form to me that I enjoy doing. What's special about XCM is not how it impresses others but also the thrill of doing it yourself!
I do magic a lot... In fact, I do it everyday in school. I even have a magic Friday where I do magic for my form eery Friday!! Excellent!
StEvEbO!
ace of kev wrote:
I would say that XCM is a branch of magic, because even though it is not magic, I wonder how many lay people can do XCMbecause a lay person is someone that doesn't do magic, not XCM
So those who do appreciate skill don't do mentalism? I have a feeling that Derren Brown, Luke Jermay, Marc Paul, Kenton Knepper etc would disagree with you.magic_evmeister wrote:Let these people who don't appreciate skill stick to mentalism
That was most unworthy Rob. If you knew Mog and his skills more you wouldn't say that kind of thing. The simple point being made was that flourishes etc are good and skilful but are not automatically magic. If someone wants to see magic, you don't do fancy riffles etc and if they want to see flourishes you don’t do card tricks. Each performer will find a balance between the two to suit their own style and the audiences they entertain.SirRawlins wrote:not jelous of stevebo's card skills are you mog?
the_mog wrote:waste of time and energy.
which puts the whole thing into a proper perspective and shows it as a personal opinion related to magic versus flourishes.from a magic point of view this is a waste of time and energy. to me the whole point of magic is for things to happen "magically" (from a specs view of course)
SirRawlins wrote:However i do think that on this occasion his comments are unconstructive, i would have expected alot more from someone with moderator status. The whole concpet behind talk magic is to be a supportive community.
Refering to Stevebo's efforts as a:-the_mog wrote:waste of time and energy.
I feel is a little off ... I'm sure plenty of other members would agree.
Rob
well to this i'd say if you DO wanna discuss it then why not do it on a forum that deals with it? superhandz.com i believe is one such forumIf you don't wanna discuss XCM then read another forum
Return to Forum of Visual Curiosities
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests