by Dean Sexton » Dec 15th, '07, 16:06
AAArgh! Gadabout coins is one of my favourites. I understand why people might not be bothered by all of this- it encourages us to raise our game, so to speak, but there is an aspect of this level of exposure that really bugs me.
The effects/sleights given in the Guardian don't really make any mention of performance techniques, misdirection etc- it's more about the secrets. This means that while a layperson may not remember every phase of the c+b routine given, they will remember the fundamental secret- something else is is use.
Even if I devised some diabolical method that bypassed this requirement (or did a similar thing for the gadabout coins or ambitious card for example) all it takes is one person to say "yeah, but he's using..." or "yeah, but he's turning over more than..." to diminish any suspension of disbelief, focus the other spectators' attention on whether or not this is the case, and interupt the flow and pace of the routine.
Alternatives? Ditch any routines that the Guardian exposes- but if someone's got these ideas in their head, they might, in all probability, try to attach the methods they know of to any effect they see, leading again to the situation mentioned above.
Sure people may forget about all of this over time, but I believe that fundamental secrets like this are the kind of thing that will stick with people, especially given the sporadic nature of most people's experiences of seeing magic- This kind of 'out of the ordinary'-type experience seems like the ideal thing to jog someone's memory/re-open certain associations.
Or maybe I'm worrying too much, and it will all blow over.
Or maybe I should stop doing magic in the sort of places that attract liberal Guardian reading know-it-all, name-your-child-after-an-item-of-fruit losers.
Sorry, that was a bit much.