Desvelar wrote:More on DB. Even when he shows you a trick there is more to it. In his Something Awful(I forge the rest) the theatre thing anyways he does this whole cutting up a news paper thing but I had already seen it previously in another book I read. He just Dressed it up and combined tricks.
One of the first things you realise in mentalism (or I did, anyway) is the gulf (chasm might be a better word) between cause and effect. It's far wider than is usual in regular magic, meaning that you have far more freedom to weave a convincing presentation that fits with what Bob Cassidy calls your subplot in
Fundamentals and what Brown develops into a whole approach to creating realism in
Absolute Magic. I think it's in the introduction where he says that even if someone intellectualises your perfromance later, as you have done above, and dissects it into a series of simple tricks held together with a veneer of presentation, that doesn't matter. He performed, you were entertained. That's all he, you or anyone else needs.
All this talk of stooges really gets me down. As I said at the start of the thread that was split off from this one. Look into pre-show work. A good place to start is Paul Brook's book "
The Gift - The 14th Step to Mentalism". If you really do have so many books on psychology and hypnosis, I seriously suggest studying them for what they say on the topic of inducing post-hypnotic suggestions.
But please, please, don't confuse owning an extensive library with understanding what it contains. And vague allusions to ideas and effects without concrete sources will only attract ridicule. Some of the people reading this thread are extremely well read in mentalism and love nothing more than to mess with the minds of people they see as bluffing it.