Craig Browning wrote:queen of clubs wrote:themagicwand wrote:Anybody ever seen a ghost?
No. No one has ever seen a ghost.
A rude and point of personal opinion vs. fact based experience.
I didn't think it was rude. I was just deliberately misinterpreting his question. "Anybody ever seen a ghost?" lent itself to a dual meaning and it was a red rag to me

Craig Browning wrote:Not all hauntings are readily explained away nor replicated. Same goes with other paranormal scenarios. The "skeptic's culture" however, singles out only the one's they can explain away and quickly shifts focus when it comes to those situations they can't write off (frequently seeking to discredit the person or persons supporting the original tale).
I've always found it amazing how all the Skeptics strive to grab headlines with their prejudice and boasts...
I write the following with a great deal of respect, so whilst we disagree fundamentally, please don't think I'm trying to argue with you, or annoy you - I'm just trying to debate with you.
You're actually the one with the bee in his bonnet about those of us with differing opinions. You say you've "always found it amazing..." etc., and that doesn't surprise me, because it's in your nature as a believer in supernatural topics to always "find things amazing" where other people might prefer to rationalise.
It's all very well to develop the point that "Skeptics" (and thanks for apparently considering that a proper noun, by the way! Flattering!) seem to always cling to the cases they can prove to have rational explanations and rarely mention all those that they cannot, but I'd rather say "I honestly don't know what the heck happened, but it definitely wasn't a ghost" than allow the seeming lack of a rational explanation further cement a belief in ghosts.
Think of it this way, you're basically saying that the cases of ghost sightings that are unexplainable by scientists go some way to prove that when people die, something called their spirit comes out of their corpse and floats around conveniently resembling their prior physical body yet translucent, and incidentally appears to sometimes be able to speak without vocal cords, move without inertia and think without a brain. I'm sorry, but that, to me, is far more of a leap of faith than a skeptic or cynic who can't explain something yet won't accept the above.
You know what? I really hope that there's no such thing as ghosts, because I can't imagine anything more crushingly dreary than to be consigned to the fate of being stuck purposelessly drifting from room to room in the general area of my death for eternity. I wouldn't even be able to thow myself infront of a speeding lorry to end it all, because aside from the fact I'd already be dead, the bloody thing would just pass right through my non-form.