Hand Size and The Pass

Struggling with an effect? Any tips (without giving too much away!) you'd like to share?

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

:)

Postby janitso » Feb 14th, '11, 12:43



I meant to say when you got really BIG hands people might think its easy to hide something in them too.

janitso
Junior Member
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Apr 23rd, '09, 10:58
Location: London,UK, 31yrs, AH

Postby screwystewie » Feb 14th, '11, 13:58

Paul Gordon wrote:The Pass is NOT the be-all and end-all of card magic. In fact, although I can do it (and I have small hands), I never use it. If you don't know, I've created hundreds of tricks (which I perform professionally) since the late 70's and all are pass-free. But, if you do use the pass - hand size is immaterial; it's 80% misdirection and timing. But, don't give up magic just because you can't do the pass. That'd be like not eating food cos you don't like the colour of the dishes it's served on! :wink:

Paul Gordon


I think it would be interesting for us all if you shared WHY you don't use the pass in any of your hundreds of tricks...

What do you think is bad about it, and what do you use that in your opinion is superior to the pass?

screwystewie
 

Postby Paul Gordon » Feb 14th, '11, 15:16

screwystewie wrote:
Paul Gordon wrote:The Pass is NOT the be-all and end-all of card magic. In fact, although I can do it (and I have small hands), I never use it. If you don't know, I've created hundreds of tricks (which I perform professionally) since the late 70's and all are pass-free. But, if you do use the pass - hand size is immaterial; it's 80% misdirection and timing. But, don't give up magic just because you can't do the pass. That'd be like not eating food cos you don't like the colour of the dishes it's served on! :wink:

Paul Gordon


I think it would be interesting for us all if you shared WHY you don't use the pass in any of your hundreds of tricks...

What do you think is bad about it, and what do you use that in your opinion is superior to the pass?


Technically, it's just not required for any of my tricks. My routines vary from Oil & Water to Ace Cutting and Lie Detectors to Red/Black separations. Imho, my magic is still very strong but simply does not require the use of The Pass. (And I don't use false deals either!) Please see my website from free video demos of many of my routines so you can see my thinking/style etc.

Yours, Paul Gordon

Paul Gordon
Preferred Member
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Oct 11th, '05, 15:40
Location: UK

Postby phillipnorthfield » Feb 14th, '11, 18:37

I agree with Paul, I haven't used the pass in 5 years and counting. I think of it in this way.
In most card tricks you are controlling one card. The pass controls one card from one location to another. The problem is it also controls another 25 or so for no reason and so is hugely inefficient. Shifts and Culls are much more useful and efficient and I think you'll find them much more useful.

phillipnorthfield
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Feb 15th, '10, 19:44

Postby bmat » Feb 14th, '11, 19:01

Three things and they may have been mentioned.

1st, hand size has no effect on the pass. The pass like most sleights is designed to be used on the off beat. Spectators are not watching your hands. An invisible pass is only a name. And while there are those that can perform the move while being burned, they are few and far between, (no matter what they tell you).

2) The pass is really not a necessary move. A double undercut does the same thing. And amazingly enough is not suspect by the laymen.

3) Use a spread pass and I will tell you why:
A) Until you get comfortable with it you can use it as a flourish (yet it does what a pass does and you don't have to hide anything) You can even show it off Whooo! Hoooo!
B) After a while you will realize that if you don't point it out (even as a flourish) people don't notice what is going on. Even better once you get over the guilt it becomes as invisible as an invisible pass.
C) seeing as the fan covers the action, hand size doesn't make a difference. (not that it makes a difference in anycase).
D) It's a fun move.

You will have to find the mechanics elswhere, but here is what is seen. You spread the deck from hand to hand. Spectator picks a card from the fan, Right hand still has its spread in place, left hand portion is squared and the spectator place the card on top of that half of the deck. Right hand portion is placed ontop of the left hand portion closing the fan to square the deck. And once deck is squared the selected card is ontop of the deck.

A great book on the pass is Gary Oullet's 'The Pass' if it is still available. The book used to come with a Vid tape (gasp) yes I'm that old, that showed the effect in motion without explanation. The book gave the explanation.

bmat
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2921
Joined: Jul 27th, '07, 18:44
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Postby Nic Castle » Feb 14th, '11, 19:11

I guess I am lucky and have long fingers which I am told is an advantage. Things are easier or an advantage until you have that thing.

As was said earlier, misdirection is a essential with the pass as with many other sleights you will learn.

When I was learning the pass initially I remember asking for some advice and was told "Why, you don't need it, what ever you want to achieve it can be done with other methods." This is true but with a little (or lots) of practice you will be able to accomplish the move.

Nic

Misdirection, this reminds me of a saying that was on the box of a game called Othello, "A minute to learn......... a life time to master"

Nic Castle
 

Postby IanKendall » Feb 14th, '11, 20:16

The pass (or any of its variations) is a very personal move. Some don't like it, some cannot do it, some say they don't need it and others are working on it.

Although I am proficient with several different card controls, from culls and steals to shuffles and cuts, the classic pass is, 95% of the time, the most efficient method for me. It's faster than any other control, more easily covered and fits in with my body language well. I wrote about this in my MUM column as well as my eBook on the pass - it's all about conviction.

As I mentioned before, the biggest hinderance to learning the pass is poor instruction followed by poor practice.

Take care, Ian

IanKendall
Senior Member
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Jun 3rd, '04, 12:03
Location: Edinburgh, (41:WP)

Postby screwystewie » Feb 15th, '11, 11:28

Paul Gordon wrote:Technically, it's just not required for any of my tricks.


I can see, obviously, how you don't need a pass for oil and water. However, I imagine in some of your hundreds of tricks a card is taken, replaced and controlled.

It would be interesting to learn why you rejected the pass for this control.

Obviously someone with your experience at least considered the pass for a control in some effects and decided another control would be superior. For those about to embark on the years of practise needed to do a pass well, it might be interesting to understand your thought process.

screwystewie
 

Postby sibex » Feb 15th, '11, 14:32

Many many thanks to you all for your replies. They are much appreciated. I think that maybe I made the mistake of watching an Allan Ackerman video. His passes are quite amazing to me.
I love card magic and am just going to keep on going... Just a little in-experience showing.

User avatar
sibex
Junior Member
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Feb 3rd, '11, 14:36

Previous

Return to Support & Tips

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests