Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
SpareJoker wrote:DITCH ROYAL ROAD. It's stuffy, old and outdated;
True, it's good as far as it goes. It just misses out all the advancements/ developments of the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, etc. (e.g. Jordan/ Elmsley count, arguably one of the most imporant tools of 20th Century card magic).cartorious wrote:I agree that some of the patter in RRTCM is a little dated, but the sleights/methods etc......are still as relevant today as they were 1000 years ago (or whenever the book was originally published).
jim ferguson wrote:Its not the effects that are outdated its just some of the presentations. If you come up with your own spin on the effects you will have, basically, a new trick.
jim ferguson wrote:I dont mean to burst any bubbles here but its not the tricks that are professional, it is the manner in which they are performed. Even a simple ''self worker'' can be a great piece if performed well
mark lewis wrote:I have never heard such rubbish in my life. 50% of my repertoire to this day comes from the Royal Road to Card Magic and it would be very hard to top the reaction I get out of my card magic.
mark lewis wrote:In any event using things like Elmsley counts is something that should be done sparingly and only for certain tricks as a lot of these moves have something fishy about them and a laymen starts to think "I don't know what he did but he did something"
mark lewis wrote:However, you also have to have a good student with I strongly suspect is not the case here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests