Piers wrote:Interesting that there was no reponse...
I bought the book, and quite like it, but personally don't think it worthy of the adoration it has picked up on another forum.
Just my view. A nice book, lots of common sense, and some good suggestions too. The journalistic style of writing didn't really appeal, but worth a flick...
Piers.

Ouch! First piece of negative reviewing I’ve met with so far. “Adoration...” Geez, do you REALLY think so?
As for the “journalistic style”. Piers, do you think this could possibly be because I AM a journalist? My writing is simple, because I AM simple! I like to get the message over in as few words as possible. If you prefer hyperbole and embellishment, then I can provide you with exactly the writing style you require. However, Tautism is the style in which I write because I believe in getting the message over in as few words as possible. When writing, I had no wish to churn out an academic reference work. I think readers appreciate that.
It’s not literature – it’s copywriting. (See, grammatically, that wasn’t a sentence – no verb - but it works!)
Anyway, Piers, I’ve just read this over and it comes across as supercilious and a little bit nasty. I DO hope you don’t take it that way. I’m trying to be funny in my own Scottish way.
Thank you for your comments, and I do hope you get something out the manual. It’s not “worth a flick”, as I hope you appreciate, it has to be worked through, exercise by task, by exercise.
Very best wishes, and kisses on the bottom
X X
Drew McAdam